Abacavir/lamivudina + atazanavir no potenciado en la práctica clínica diaria: doce años de experiencia / Abacavir/lamivudine + unboosted atazanavir in routine clinical practice: Twelve years experience

Objetivo: Describir la eficacia en práctica clínica de abacavir, lamivudina y atazanavir sin potenciar (ABC/3TC+ATV) en pacientes pretratados. Pacientes y métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional retrospectivo para describir las características clínicas y la evolución de los pacientes que, por prescripción facultativa, habían recibido tratamiento con ABC/3TC+ATV desde noviembre de 2004 hasta el 15 de junio de 2015. Resultados: Se incluyeron 236 pacientes. La mediana de edad (IQR) fue de 45años (42-50) y el 69% eran varones. Los principales motivos para su indicación fueron toxicidad en 130 pacientes (56%), simplificación en 60 (20%) y fracaso virológico (FV) en 29 (14%). El tratamiento previo contenía un inhibidor de la proteasa (IP) en 115 pacientes (48,7%), 3 inhibidores de la transcriptasa inversa análogos de nucleósido (ITIAN) en 56 (28%) y 2ITIAN y un inhibidor de la transcriptasa inversa no análogo de nucleósido (ITINAN) en 19 (8,1%). Tras una mediana de 2,2años (IQR0,8-5,3), 66 (28%) pacientes continuaban con la misma pauta, se retiró en 170 (72%), en 30 de ellos por FV (12,7%) y en 22 (9,3%) por pérdidas de seguimiento. Conclusión: En pacientes seleccionados, ABC/3TC+ATV es una alternativa de simplificación eficaz y bien tolerada, usada principalmente para minimizar la toxicidad (AU)

Objective: To describe the experience using the combination abacavir, lamivudine plus non-boosted atazanavir (ABC/3TC+ATV) in a group of pretreated patients. Patients and methods: We performed a retrospective observational study to describe baseline characteristics and the evolution of patients who had received or were treating with ABC/3TC+ATV, from November 2004 and June 15th 2015, in the clinical setting. Results: Overall, 236 patients were included in the study. Median age (IQR) was 45 (42-50) years and 69% were male. The main reasons for using this combination were previous toxicity in 130 patients (56%), simplification in 60 (20%) and virologic failure in 29 (14%). Previous treatment was based in boosted protease inhibitor in 115 patients (48.7%), 3 analogs in 56 (28%) and non-analogous based in 19 (8.1%). Median treatment length was 2.2 years (IQR0.8-5.3). A total of 66 (28%) patients continue receiving ABC/3TC+ATV (median time 5.7, IQR2.2-8.3), treatment was changed in 170 patients (72%) (median time 1.6 years, IQR0.7-3.6), and 22 (9.3%) patients were lost. Virological failure was assessed in 30 patients. Conclusion: In selected patients, ABC/3TC+ATV is a durable and attractive therapeutic alternative (AU)

Abacavir/lamivudine + unboosted atazanavir in routine clinical practice: Twelve years experience. / Abacavir/lamivudina + atazanavir no potenciado en la práctica clínica diaria: doce años de experiencia.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the experience using the combination abacavir, lamivudine plus non-boosted atazanavir (ABC/3TC+ATV) in a group of pretreated patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study to describe baseline characteristics and the evolution of patients who had received or were treating with ABC/3TC+ATV, from November 2004 and June 15th 2015, in the clinical setting. RESULTS: Overall, 236 patients were included in the study. Median age (IQR) was 45 (42-50) years and 69% were male. The main reasons for using this combination were previous toxicity in 130 patients (56%), simplification in 60 (20%) and virologic failure in 29 (14%). Previous treatment was based in boosted protease inhibitor in 115 patients (48.7%), 3 analogs in 56 (28%) and non-analogous based in 19 (8.1%). Median treatment length was 2.2 years (IQR0.8-5.3). A total of 66 (28%) patients continue receiving ABC/3TC+ATV (median time 5.7, IQR2.2-8.3), treatment was changed in 170 patients (72%) (median time 1.6 years, IQR0.7-3.6), and 22 (9.3%) patients were lost. Virological failure was assessed in 30 patients. CONCLUSION: In selected patients, ABC/3TC+ATV is a durable and attractive therapeutic alternative.

Coformulated bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide versus dolutegravir with emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide, for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection (GS-US-380-1490): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) coadministered with two nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) are recommended as first-line treatment for HIV, and coformulated fixed-dose combinations are preferred to facilitate adherence. We report 48-week results from a study comparing initial HIV-1 treatment with bictegravir-a novel INSTI with a high in-vitro barrier to resistance and low potential as a perpetrator or victim of clinically relevant drug interactions-coformulated with the NRTI combination emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide as a fixed-dose combination to dolutegravir administered with coformulated emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide. METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial, HIV-infected adults were screened and enrolled at 126 outpatient centres in 10 countries in Australia, Europe, Latin America, and North America. Participants were previously untreated adults (HIV-1 RNA ≥500 copies per mL) with estimated glomerular filtration rate of at least 30 mL/min. Chronic hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C co-infection was allowed. We randomly assigned participants (1:1) to receive oral fixed-dose combination bictegravir 50 mg, emtricitabine 200 mg, and tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg or dolutegravir 50 mg with coformulated emtricitabine 200 mg and tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg, with matching placebo, once a day for 144 weeks. Investigators, participants, study staff, and those assessing outcomes were masked to treatment group. All participants who received at least one dose of study drug were included in primary efficacy and safety analyses. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA of less than 50 copies per mL at week 48 (US Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm), with a prespecified non-inferiority margin of -12%. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02607956. FINDINGS: Between Nov 11, 2015, and July 15, 2016, 742 participants were screened for eligibility, of whom 657 were randomly assigned to treatment (327 with bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide fixed-dose combination [bictegravir group] and 330 with dolutegravir plus emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide [dolutegravir group]). 320 participants who received the bictegravir regimen and 325 participants who received the dolutegravir regimen were included in the primary efficacy analyses. At week 48, HIV-1 RNA <50 copies per mL was achieved in 286 (89%) of 320 participants in the bictegravir group and 302 (93%) of 325 in the dolutegravir group (difference -3·5%, 95·002% CI -7·9 to 1·0, p=0·12), showing non-inferiority of the bictegravir regimen to the dolutegravir regimen. No treatment-emergent resistance to any study drug was observed. Incidence and severity of adverse events were similar between groups, and few participants discontinued treatment due to adverse events (5 [2%] of 320 in the bictegravir group and 1 [<1%] 325 in the dolutegravir group). Study drug-related adverse events were less common in the bictegravir group than in the dolutegravir group (57 [18%] of 320 vs 83 [26%] of 325, p=0·022). INTERPRETATION: At 48 weeks, virological suppression with the bictegravir regimen was achieved and was non-inferior to the dolutegravir regimen in previously untreated adults. There was no emergent resistance to either regimen. The fixed-dose combination of bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide was safe and well tolerated compared with the dolutegravir regimen. FUNDING: Gilead Sciences Inc.

Neuropatogénesis inducida por el virus del sida: estrategias terapéuticas frente a la neurodegeneración inducida por la glucoproteína gp120/Tat en el sistema nervioso central / Summary. Neuroinflammation is a key process in the neuropathogenesis of AIDS virus since as a result of the aberrant in the central nervous system

La neuroinflamación constituye un proceso clave en la neuropatogénesis del virus del sida como consecuencia de la activación aberrante de receptores de quimiocinas (CXCR4, CX3CR1 y CCR5), ya que la liberación de citocinas proinflamatorias por las células infectadas amplifica la neurotoxicidad microglial y genera lipoperóxidos y especies reactivas de oxígeno que, en última instancia, dañan la neurona. Por otro lado, la neurotoxina Tat induce alteraciones dendríticas por interacción con el receptor LRP (receptor de lipoproteínas de baja densidad) e induce una excesiva estimulación de los receptores de N-metil D-aspartato. Además, la interacción aberrante de la glucoproteína gp120 con el receptor CXCR4 induce apoptosis dependiente de caspasa 3 (también libera ceramida) y activa las proteínas apoptóticas p53 y retinoblastoma como mecanismos neurotóxicos asociados a la disfunción neural en el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana 1 (VIH-1). Asimismo, la gliosis/activación microglial y la liberación de factores virales por los monocitos infectados, y el incremento de determinadas quimiocinas en el líquido cefalorraquídeo (MCP-1 y fractalcina, entre otras), contribuyen a la neuropatogénesis del VIH-1. Por otro lado, se han detectado depósitos de alfa-sinucleína y de beta-amiloide en cerebros post mortem de seropositivos de edad avanzada. Además, se han descrito varios marcadores sistémicos relacionados con los efectos degenerativos del virus y de sus neurotoxinas en el sistema nervioso central, tales como osteopontina, CD163 y fractalcina, entre otros. Por último, se han realizado ensayos clínicos basados en estrategias protectoras relacionadas con la inhibición de proteínas apoptóticas (inhibidores de GSK-3 beta), con inhibidores de la activación microglial (minociclina), antioxidantes (selegilina) o factores tróficos (IGF-1, hormona del crecimiento o eritropoyetina), que muestran efectos beneficiosos como tratamientos complementarios a la terapia antirretroviral (AU)

Neuroinflammation is a key process in the neuropathogenesis of AIDS virus since as a result of the aberrant activation of the chemokine receptors (CXCR4, CX3CR1 and CR5) produces proinflammatory cytokine release by infected cells, increases microglial neurotoxicity and generates lipoperoxides and reactive oxygen species (ROS) that eventually damage the neuron. Moreover, the neurotoxin Tat produces dendritic loss by interacting with the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LRP) and also overstimulates N-methyl D-aspartate receptors (NMDA). Furthermore, the aberrant interaction of glycoprotein gp120 with the CXCR4 chemokine receptor causes caspase-3-dependent apoptosis (ceramide is also released) activating apoptotic proteins (p53 and retinoblastoma), which are part of the neurotoxic mechanisms associated to neuronal dysfunction in neuroAIDS. Similarly, gliosis/microglial activation and the release of neurotoxic factors by infected monocytes with elevated amounts of certain chemokines in the cerebrospinal fluid (MCP-1 and fractalkine, among others) contribute to the neuropathogenesis of HIV-1. Alpha-synuclein and beta amyloid deposits have also been detected in post mortem brains of seropositives patients. In addition, there are studies have detected several systemic markers related with the degenerative effects of the virus and its neurotoxins on the central nervous system; such as osteopontin, CD163 and fractalkine, among others. Lastly, clinical trials have been conducted using protective strategies related that attempt to inhibit apoptotic proteins (GSK-3 beta), microglial activation inhibitors (minocycline), antioxidants (selegiline) or trophic factors (IGF-1, growth hormone or erythropoietin). These trials have shown that their treatments are beneficial and complementary to treat complications of HIV/AIDS (AU)